HappyLuke Casino - Postponing my withdrawal
User: hills.chance, Disputed casino: HappyLuke Casino, Status: REJECTED, Amount: 4000 CN¥, Published: 15.08.2019
You can see that I store at 06:05&06:22 on August 6.
I am pull back cash at 09:21 on August 6.
I didn't pass it until 14:30 on August 6, so I dropped the withdrawal and counseled the client service.
Customer administration has consistently been founded on reviewing the game, continually pushing away.
I will keep on applying for withdrawals at 18:30 on August sixth, until 7:00 on August seventh, I despite everything have not gotten the account.
The review took eleven hours and there was no result.Then I dropped the withdrawal and asked the client assistance again.
Still cursory, let me keep on wait.
but the most concerning issue is that in China, the withdrawal time of every gambling club is finished in 1 moment to 120 minutes.
Even in HappyLuke, I went through 20-30 minutes on my last withdrawal.
This is the thing that I think they are defrauding me.
Comments
17.08.2019
hills.chance
Since August sixth, I have asked the client support at any rate multiple times, and each answer is under review.
EVERYTIME!
As yet auditing the game procedure until now!
This isn't ordinary, no supervisor gave me an answer, just client care has been Perfuse me
I asked which game was looked into and there was no answer.
There are 40 hours left, they have not given any replys here.
I need to whine to Curacao-Egaming
Please focus on the players, in the event that they can not pull back this amount(500Euro),Then please make a special effort to be careful.
If this withdrawal falls flat, I will send you your conduct to different betting forums.(Including Vietnam of China's Thailand
forums).
What you are doing now is to postpone my withdrawal, which makes me restless, drops the pull back, and loses them all.
02.09.2019
KoiSlots
Based on player's last post it is presently evident that the contested withdrawal sum has been played and lost by the player. In such circumstance, KoiSlots Grumblings Group has no other alternative, yet to dismiss the case as the principle protests subject is no longer valid.