FortuneJack Casino - Offered me an appealing reward, at that point continue to appropriate rewards

Dear @qjohnson,

Your account has been associated for benefit with the examination led by Social Investigations office and was sent to the Extortion Avoidance Group to consider further activities against claimed multi-accounting. Extortion Counteraction Group has discovered connections with 2 different accounts enrolled on our site, which is carefully restricted by our T&C.

With our generosity, we needed to give you your last store back, yet as it was not exactly least withdrawal sum, we chose to top off it to the 0.004 BTC (least withdrawal sum as per T&C) which you have just gotten.
(I'm transferring the screen captures as a proof that you have just pulled back 0.004 BTC.)
We will sit tight for @koislots reasonable judgment.
Cheers,

Hello, and yes I received that .004 bitcoin. Would you be able to please give some confirmation of these cases. This will be the fhird or fourth time I've inquired. A debt of gratitude is in order for your time

Dear FortuneJack Casino,

KoiSlots Grievances Group is generously requesting that you give proof/s where it is plainly noticeable that the player enrolled all the more then one account, alongside cited terms that may have been penetrated by player's actions.

Upon KoiSlots Objections Terms we consider all proof carefully classified and won't be openly shown or sent to the outsider. If you don't mind send required data straightforwardly to suppor­­t@­k­oi­sl­­o­­ts.com.

Thank you for your cooperation.

For the second time now I might want to ask the fortune jack agent to connect with me so I can send all reports expected to show that the account being referred to is genuinely mine and any of these other "connected accounts" without a doubt couldnt have or give the equivalent documents,

Hi Dear Player,
Tragic to see you miserable structure our judgment. In any case, kindly be impressive and comprehend, that Gambling club has strategies that are over all the stories and preclusion of Multi-Accounting comes as one of the basic here. We have obliged confirmations to back our choice and might want to share it to @KoiSlots group, the verifications may contain a portion of the touchy information on your advanced impressions and we might want to request your authorization earlier sharing it. On the off chance that your understanding, we are glad to flexibly KoiSlots with the information and hang tight for conclusive judgment with persistence.
Cheers,
David.

Whatever your alleged "proofs" are, I certain expectation they clarify why you would offer such an appealing reward while realizing an account was in break of agreement and that regardless of the turnout Fortune jack was not going to pay out any cash. You appear to be truly acceptable at moving around that question I have more than once asked.

Hi Dear Player,

I am here to educate you about definite insights about our examination, with respect to your case. Extortion Control And Counteraction Division of FortuneJack has distinguished penetrate of our Terms and Conditions, correctly: "Copy/Numerous Accounts. Numerous clients wish to work equal accounts so as to isolate their betting spend. Despite this action, permit holders must have the option to distinguish and relate 'connected' accounts that may have a place or be heavily influenced by the equivalent person."

Evidences supporting our examination has been sent to @KoiSlots and we will be pausing and along these lines concurring on definite judgment from KoiSlots.

Cheers,
David.

KoiSlots Protests Group has been given enough data and proof for sake FortuneJack Gambling club the executives in respects of this grievance to affirm and legitimize the gambling club actions.

Based on the abovementioned, KoiSlots Objections Group think about this case as Settled and it is presently authoritatively shut. If there should be an occurrence of a conflict with our choice we remind player that further help on this issue could be mentioned from the pertinent administrative body.